{"id":4233,"date":"2025-12-29T11:37:43","date_gmt":"2025-12-29T12:37:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/?p=4233"},"modified":"2026-01-02T13:48:16","modified_gmt":"2026-01-02T13:48:16","slug":"after-trump-met-zelensky-and-called-putin-the-main-obstacle-to-peace-is-clear-and-its-not-territory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/2025\/12\/29\/after-trump-met-zelensky-and-called-putin-the-main-obstacle-to-peace-is-clear-and-its-not-territory\/","title":{"rendered":"After Trump met Zelensky and called Putin, the main obstacle to peace is clear \u2013 and it\u2019s not territory"},"content":{"rendered":"

The US president\u2019s contacts on December 28 proved who controls the endgame<\/strong><\/p>\n

Two important events of this month:<\/p>\n

\u2013\u00a0On December 15, the two-day negotiations between the US and Ukraine concluded in Berlin. European representatives joined the talks at the final stage. Following the discussions, it was announced that about 90% of issues concerning the Ukraine peace deal had been resolved.<\/p>\n

\u2013\u00a0On December 28, US President Donald Trump met with Vladimir Zelensky at Mar-a-Lago. Following the meeting, it was said that around 95% of the issues had been resolved.<\/p>\n

The territorial issue is usually considered the main sticking point; the argument goes that if Zelensky were to withdraw Ukrainian forces from Donbass, the conflict would come to an immediate end. However, this isn\u2019t entirely true. In reality, the biggest issue is Western security guarantees which Zelensky demands in exchange for agreeing to the peace plan. This has been referred to as \u201cNATO Article 5-style guarantees,\u201d<\/em> a term first introduced by Ukrainian propaganda during the Istanbul negotiations in the spring of 2022.<\/p>\n

America: \u201cHurry up!\u201d<\/em><\/h2>\n

The issue of security guarantees was the main reason the deal fell through in 2022. Then-UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson visited Kiev and told Zelensky that the West would sign no such guarantees and wouldn\u2019t engage in a military conflict with Russia because of Ukraine.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"RT\"
No turning point for Ukraine: The frontline reality Western media won\u2019t show<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Little has changed since then, and we are confident that Ukraine won\u2019t receive any legally binding guarantees from Trump. This is evident from the language used by the Americans, who use terms such as\u00a0\u201cassurances\u201d<\/em> instead of \u201cguarantees.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0<\/p>\n

It feels like a simple two-step maneuver. To pressure Zelensky, Trump makes grand promises. Hurry up, he says, agree to our terms, and we\u2019ll provide you with security that would even make NATO nations jealous! You want Congress to vote? Sure, don\u2019t worry! (Who wouldn\u2019t back empty promises?)<\/p>\n

The tactic may sound familiar \u2013 anyone who\u2019s dealt with real estate agents knows it well. The agent flits around the buyer, urging them to act fast because the opportunity might slip away: Tomorrow, prices will go up, and the day after everything will be sold out. Come on, hurry up!\u00a0<\/p>\n

Europe: Trying not to miss the boat\u00a0<\/h2>\n

Since Trump\u2019s return to the White House, European globalists have been focused on winning his favor. Time and again, European leaders attempt to interfere in the direct negotiations between Russia and the US, either disrupting the talks or trying to persuade Trump to push Russia into accepting their terms.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s no point in describing these terms in detail; the main idea is to keep Kiev\u2019s current regime in place and allow Ukraine to pursue anti-Russian policies and receive Western military support even after the end of the conflict. This leaves space for revenge and means that Ukraine\u2019s defeat \u2013 and by extension, Europe\u2019s \u2013 won\u2019t look catastrophic.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The second part of Europe\u2019s strategy involves securing funding to support Ukraine and sustain the ongoing conflict. Despite a failed attempt to seize Russian sovereign assets, Europe has managed to find some financial resources for the coming year. This suggests that both globalist Europe and Kiev believe there\u2019s still time. They can always surrender later; but as long as they are able to hold the front, they feel they can continue fighting.<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"RT\"
How Russia fought \u2013 and won \u2013 in 2025<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Among the various statements made yesterday at Mar-a-Lago, Trump\u2019s remark that Europe would bear the primary responsibility for Ukraine\u2019s post-war security went largely unnoticed. This indicates that efforts to get the US to commit to \u201cArticle Five-style guarantees\u201d<\/em> have faltered. Europe might begin pushing Kiev toward capitulation to minimize its own losses.<\/p>\n

Russia: The most predictable stance<\/h2>\n

Based on his discussions with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump claims that Russia is open to peace. But what kind of peace plan are we talking about? The one the US and Europe agreed upon in Berlin? Certainly not. This is at least the third round of negotiations (the first was in the spring, the second in the summer after the summit in Alaska), and each time Moscow\u2019s reaction to Western \u201cpeace plans\u201d<\/em> follows a familiar script.<\/p>\n

While Europe and Ukraine work on rewriting the peace agreement negotiated by Putin and Trump, top Russian officials such as Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, and presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov monotonously repeat: if it wasn\u2019t agreed upon with Moscow, Russia won\u2019t accept it.<\/p>\n

As Russia\u2019s stance continues to be ignored, Putin steps in and makes it clear where Ukraine and Europe can shove their mutually agreed-upon plans.\u00a0<\/p>\n

This has already happened twice in December: On December 13 at the Russian Defense Ministry Board Meeting, and on December 27, on the eve of Trump\u2019s meeting with Zelensky. Putin made it clear that Russia won\u2019t make any compromises regarding Ukraine and will accomplish its goals one way or another. In other words, peace will only come on Russia\u2019s terms.<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"US
Fyodor Lukyanov: Trump finished off the globalist illusion in 2025<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Russia: The art of diplomacy<\/h2>\n

One might wonder why Russia even engages in negotiations when they consistently end the same way.<\/p>\n

There are two main reasons for this: First, the primary goal of Russian diplomacy is to facilitate America\u2019s exit from the conflict. In many ways, Russia has already succeeded in doing so; this has pushed the conflict into its final phase, ensuring the agony of the Kiev regime.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Secondly, for peace to be lasting, it must be accepted by all parties as the only viable option \u2013 this eliminates the risk of revanchism. The conditions first proposed in Istanbul in 2022 were articulated by the US and have served as the starting point for any negotiations. This is the result of diplomacy bolstered by successes on the battlefield. Who knows what kind of peace plan Trump would be advocating now if Moscow weren\u2019t engaged in talks with him?<\/p>\n

If Moscow is engaged in Trump\u2019s game with Zelensky and is willing to come to an agreement with Kiev, Trump\u2019s behavior could be part of a plan that the Kremlin is aware of. Of course, it\u2019s largely a matter of mutual trust, but, who knows, there may be a secret additional protocol signed by Putin and Trump through US envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump\u2019s son-in-law Jared Kushner, confirming that Kiev will receive no real military guarantees, regardless of what public statements are made or what the Europeans include in the peace plan.<\/p>\n

Ukraine: Real security guarantees<\/h2>\n

Above, we mentioned Putin\u2019s conditions outlined during the negotiations in Istanbul. In 2022, a draft \u201cTreaty on Permanent Neutrality and Security Guarantees for Ukraine\u201d<\/em> was presented in Istanbul. The plan envisioned that, alongside the US, the UK, and France, Russia and China would also serve as security guarantors for Ukraine.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"US
The foreign-policy twist of 2025: What Trump\u2019s pivot means for Ukraine<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The guarantees could be reduced to three key points:<\/p>\n

1. Guarantees are contingent on Ukraine maintaining its neutrality and adhering to other conditions of the agreement (including protecting the status of the Russian language, the Russian Orthodox Church, ensuring denazification, reducing the size of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and legally renouncing claims to certain territories).<\/p>\n

2. No arms or troops can be supplied to Ukraine, nor can military exercises be conducted without the consent of all parties involved.<\/p>\n

3. Any actions regarding Ukraine must receive unanimous approval from all guarantors (including Russia). This essentially introduces a veto principle similar to that of the UN Security Council.<\/p>\n

It seems that Russia is only open to a peace settlement based on these principles. There are no reasons for the Kremlin to agree to unilateral security guarantees for Ukraine without Russia\u2019s involvement, as long as it is able to fight.<\/p>\n

However, I currently see no reason for Washington, Paris, or London to support such an agreement.\u00a0<\/p>\n

This indicates that a true peace resolution remains elusive. As President Putin has stated, in the coming months Russia will likely have to achieve its goals in the Ukraine conflict by military means.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The US president\u2019s contacts on December 28 proved who controls the endgame Two important events of this month: \u2013\u00a0On December […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4235,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[11],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4233"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4233"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4233\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4239,"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4233\/revisions\/4239"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4235"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}