{"id":8071,"date":"2026-07-25T19:40:36","date_gmt":"2026-07-25T19:40:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/?p=8071"},"modified":"2026-08-07T13:54:27","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T13:54:27","slug":"the-revolt-against-zelensky","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/2026\/07\/25\/the-revolt-against-zelensky\/","title":{"rendered":"The revolt against Zelensky"},"content":{"rendered":"
Military commanders, political rivals, and Brussels are closing in on Ukraine\u2019s increasingly isolated leader<\/strong><\/p>\n You can think whatever you like of Ukraine\u2019s Vladimir Zelensky, but there is no doubt that the man has a talent for uniting people and he\u2019s particularly good at uniting them against himself.<\/p>\n He\u2019s already provoked what looks increasingly like a second\u00a0\u201dMaidan\u201d<\/em>\u00a0as the streets are again seething with indignation. Cardboard signs have replaced banners, while chants of\u00a0\u201dShame!\u201d<\/em>\u00a0can once more be heard, and the sense of d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu is so strong that it feels as though it\u2019s still July 2025, when Ukraine was protesting against Zelensky\u2019s attempts to dismantle the independence of the NABU and SAP anti-corruption agencies.<\/p>\n This time, however, the immediate cause is different because the demonstrations began as a protest against the resignation of Defense Minister Mikhail Fedorov, continued as a protest against the strategy of Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Alexander Syrsky, and now threaten to become a festival of personal grievances against Zelensky himself.<\/p>\n There\u2019s another important difference, in that for the first time, this isn\u2019t simply an abstract mass of concerned citizens taking to the streets. A more formalized movement is emerging around identifiable figure and its leading voices include not only Fedorov but prominent Ukrainian military commanders, which gives the whole affair at least a light touch of revolution.<\/p>\n Of course, there\u2019s still a long way to go before Zelensky is actually removed, but the confrontation between competing factions of the Ukrainian elite is clearly intensifying and this also explains the striking similarity between the current protests and those of last year. What we are witnessing isn\u2019t an isolated crisis, but another public manifestation of a conflict that has been developing since the summer of 2025.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The essence of that conflict is fairly simple in that Zelensky wants to become the full sovereign of Ukraine, but his opponents want to strip him of much of that power and turn him into something closer to a figurehead. The West, meanwhile, wants to ensure that whatever the outcome, the Ukrainian government remains firmly within its orbit.<\/p>\n In this context, it\u2019s no coincidence that Fedorov found himself at the center of the latest scandal, given he\u2019s as much a representative of Ukraine\u2019s Western-oriented system as the country\u2019s anti-corruption agencies. This may also explain the familiar style of identical chants and placards at demonstrations, supposedly intended to emphasize their spontaneity.<\/p>\n Zelensky was effectively forced to appoint Fedorov as defense minister in the aftermath of\u00a0\u201dMindichgate,\u201d<\/em>\u00a0placing him in a position to oversee the enormous financial flows passing through the Ukrainian military.<\/p>\n The head honcho was clearly unhappy with this arrangement,\u00a0but in the wake of a humiliating corruption scandal, he could hardly challenge his opponents openly, so instead he devised a more elaborate solution in removing Fedorov from the Cabinet under the respectable-sounding pretext of\u00a0\u201dgovernment renewal.\u201d<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n The maneuver appears to have been only half successful. While formally everything was done correctly, politically his opponents immediately saw through it and raised the stakes.<\/p>\n Ultimately, the confrontation came down to the much larger question of whether\u00a0Zelensky would retain the control over the military that he had consolidated in 2024, and the outcome was mixed.<\/p>\n Zelensky didn\u2019t completely reverse the Defense Ministry reshuffle, even under considerable pressure, but Syrsky was ultimately removed as commander-in-chief and replaced by the more oppositional and defiant Mikhail Drapaty.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Drapaty had previously left his post as commander of the Ground Forces amid controversy after publicly criticizing conditions within the Ukrainian military and this time he was among the first senior figures to criticize the command openly and support Fedorov following his dismissal. Zelensky will clearly find him more difficult to manage than Syrsky, who was considered reliably loyal to the presidential administration.<\/p>\n At first glance, this looks like a return to early 2024, when Commander-in-Chief Valery Zaluzhny possessed sufficient personal authority to challenge the president, but there\u2019s an important difference. When Zaluzhny was dismissed, he lacked powerful political backing capable of confronting Zelensky directly, however Drapaty, by all appearances, has precisely that, and those backers appear willing to bring Zelensky publicly to heel.<\/p>\n To be clear, I\u2019m not talking about the protesters carrying placards, because they are largely window dressing. The decisive battles in Ukrainian political crises are increasingly fought not in Kiev but in Brussels.<\/p>\n Last year, Zelensky held his ground until the European Union threatened to withhold financial assistance, and, this time, according to reports, events followed much the same script, while Syrsky appeared certain to remain in his position until the Western Europeans intervened.<\/p>\n This leads to an interesting conclusion in that for Zelensky, the EU may now be a considerably more authoritarian master than the United States ever was.<\/p>\n At first glance, one might expect the opposite, but when Ukrainian grant-funded organizations were primarily overseen by the US Democratic establishment and the Biden administration, Zelensky retained considerable room for maneuver. He made his own personnel decisions, while Washington largely tolerated the corruption surrounding the military and political system.<\/p>\n
