{"id":7007,"date":"2026-06-25T12:18:59","date_gmt":"2026-06-25T12:18:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/?p=7007"},"modified":"2026-06-26T13:46:05","modified_gmt":"2026-06-26T13:46:05","slug":"zelensky-threatened-belarus-then-declared-victory-out-of-thin-air","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/2026\/06\/25\/zelensky-threatened-belarus-then-declared-victory-out-of-thin-air\/","title":{"rendered":"Zelensky threatened Belarus \u2013 then declared victory out of thin air"},"content":{"rendered":"

The relay-station drama exposed Kiev\u2019s appetite for escalation \u2013 and its fear of consequences<\/strong><\/p>\n

On June 19, Ukraine\u2019s Vladimir Zelensky issued an ultimatum to Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, demanding the removal of drone relay stations allegedly located on Belarusian territory and being used to guide Russian drone attacks on Ukraine.\u00a0<\/p>\n

On June 24, Zelensky stated that Lukashenko had complied with his ultimatum and the relay stations were no longer operational. Lukashenko did not comment, and no evidence of either the existence or removal of these stations was provided. We are supposed to take Zelensky at his word.<\/p>\n

Below, we examine what the story was all about, why Kiev resorted to such rhetorical escalation, and why it ended the way it did.\u00a0<\/p>\n

What happened and where?\u00a0<\/h2>\n

While Russia is Ukraine\u2019s eastern and northeastern neighbor, Belarus lies directly to the north of Ukraine. From Belarus, the western regions of Ukraine and the Ukraine-Poland border are accessible via the shortest possible route. And the straight-line distance to Kiev from the Ukraine-Belarus border is less than 100 km.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"RT\"
The end of the Polish-Ukrainian love story<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Belarus, however, is not participating in Russia\u2019s Special Military Operation. The only time Russia entered Ukraine via Belarus was in February-March 2022, when Russian troops were airdropped from Gomel region to the Gostomel airfield near Kiev, followed by ground supplies for the Gostomel group. Russian troops also withdrew toward Gomel, Belarus, in early April 2022. According to Russia\u2019s rhetoric, Belarus is an \u201cally not involved in the hostilities.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko considers himself more of a mediator between Russia and Ukraine: the first negotiations between Russia and Ukraine occurred in Gomel in 2022, and then moved to Istanbul a week later.\u00a0<\/p>\n

However, Belarus in the north poses a constant and serious threat to Ukraine: the latter has to maintain infantry cover and air defense units along the entire 1,000 km-long Ukraine-Belarus border. Meanwhile, these tens of thousands of servicemen, though not of the best combat quality, could be useful at the front, considering the Ukrainian army\u2019s catastrophic personnel shortage.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Zelensky himself is quite nervous. Since January of this year, he has toughened his rhetoric towards Lukashenko, and in February even imposed sanctions against him.<\/p>\n

The issue of the relay stations has also been raised repeatedly. For example, on February 23, Zelensky stated that the Ukrainian side had done everything possible to ensure that \u201cthree or four\u201d<\/em> of them \u201cno longer exist\u201d<\/em> on Belarusian territory. Just like today, no data on the existence of the stations or their removal was published at the time.\u00a0<\/p>\n

On April 18, Zelensky stated that Belarus, on orders from Russia, was preparing to attack Ukraine (allegedly, on Lukashenko\u2019s orders, roads to the border were being built and artillery positions were being set up) and, in a rather rude manner, threatened the Belarusian president with the fate of the kidnapped Maduro.<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"FILE
Zelensky doubles down on ultimatum to Russian ally<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

All these stories appeared in the media and then quickly disappeared, while nothing happened on the ground. The Belarusian side responded in a reserved manner; Belarusians made it clear that they weren\u2019t seeking conflict, but if necessary, were ready to defend themselves and would not tolerate aggression.<\/p>\n

We must note that the Belarusian army, although well-equipped, is quite small: in peacetime, its ground forces number approximately 20,000 people. This number could quickly be increased to 100,000 by calling up reservists, but despite regular mobilization exercises, there have been no signs of calling up reserve forces in Belarus.\u00a0<\/p>\n

In any case, Zelensky\u2019s ultimatum on Saturday was a logical continuation of his increasingly aggressive rhetoric, and it caused a stir only because of the clear deadline: within a week, Zelensky promised to \u201cremove\u201d<\/em> Russian equipment from Belarusian territory himself. He also threatened to strike Belarusian oil refineries, which allegedly supply fuel to the Russian army.<\/p>\n

What were the options?<\/h2>\n

Ukraine\u2019s supporters took Zelensky\u2019s threats seriously and even enthusiastically. This is understandable: according to Western media, Ukraine has turned the tide of the conflict since the beginning of the year and is decisively defeating Russia in the air. From this perspective, it is quite logical to expand the conflict to Moscow\u2019s allies.<\/p>\n

We identified four possible outcomes of Zelensky\u2019s ultimatum:\u00a0<\/p>\n

First (improbable) option: Lukashenko could have complied with the ultimatum, publicly admitting that the relay stations were in place but were removed at the request of the Ukrainian side. Alternatively, he could publicly refuse to supply Russia with fuel.<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"FILE
Zelensky threatens to attack Belarus<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Second option: Ukraine could have carried out a widespread, massive air attack on targets in Belarus; in addition to the suspected relay stations, he could have targeted the oil refinery in Mozyr, infrastructure, and energy facilities.<\/p>\n

Third option: As in February, Zelensky could declare that the relay stations were removed. He announced the threat, he resolved it. The story would soon become irrelevant and would be forgotten in a few days.<\/p>\n

Finally, the fourth option: Ukraine could have launched minor provocations against Belarus, pushing its red lines. First, one or two drones could strike insignificant targets, or even an isolated forest area. Then the drones would increase in number, the targets would become more serious, and in just a few weeks or months, the skies over Belarus would become as turbulent as in the European part of Russia. Moscow would have to supply its ally with missile defense systems, which would mean pulling air defense systems from its own territory and weakening its own airspace.<\/p>\n

It might look like the latter option could be a win-win for Kiev. Since Ukraine is already under fire, it has nothing to lose, so it could complicate matters for Moscow without much risk \u2013 most likely, such \u2018salami tactics\u2019 would not provide grounds for a decisive response.<\/p>\n

However, this option comes with significant risk. So far, Kiev has refrained from declaring that the air attacks on Ukraine are carried out from Belarusian territory. But after the first Ukrainian strike, Lukashenko would be able to ask Moscow for protection, and Moscow, in accordance with its allied obligations, would provide such protection.<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"RT\"
Britain bought the keys to Ukraine\u2019s nuclear future \u2013 what\u2019s next?<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

What would happen next is that Belarusian airspace would be used for attacks on Ukraine. We\u2019ve already mentioned the 1,000 km-long Ukraine-Belarus border. Currently, to attack Kiev, a Geran-type drone has to fly 300-500 km over Ukrainian territory. This means that Ukrainian mobile fire teams have a good chance of identifying and shooting down the drone before it reaches the target.<\/p>\n

However, the distance from the Belarusian border to Kiev is less than 100 kilometers by air, and the Ukrainian capital could be attacked directly with UMPK precision-guided munitions, against which air defenses are virtually ineffective. Currently, UMPK bomb kits are used only at the front; they cannot reach Ukrainian cities in the rear.<\/p>\n

These precision-guided munitions would also be able to target the strategically important railway route from Poland to Kiev and the northern part of the Ukraine-Poland border. Therefore, a proper and decisive response would have the opposite effect to what Kiev intended: the Ukrainian capital and cities in the rear would become more vulnerable, not safer.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Therefore, Kiev certainly understands that drawing Belarus into the conflict will dramatically worsen Ukraine\u2019s strategic position.<\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

We all know how the story with the relay stations ended. Just like in February, Zelensky chose the third option, declaring that the stations had been shut down at his request. His attempt to \u2018bluff\u2019 Lukashenko with his ultimatum failed. Meanwhile, Minsk hasn\u2019t commented on the situation at all, ignoring both the ultimatum and its miraculous revocation.<\/p>\n

However, in a wider sense, this is hardly the end of the story. Zelensky\u2019s logic of verbal escalation leaves him with no other option but to resort to threats again and again. After all, the drones will continue flying and the aerial threat can\u2019t be solved with magic spells on the internet.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The relay-station drama exposed Kiev\u2019s appetite for escalation \u2013 and its fear of consequences On June 19, Ukraine\u2019s Vladimir Zelensky […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7009,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[11],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7007"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7007"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7007\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7013,"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7007\/revisions\/7013"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7009"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}