{"id":6411,"date":"2026-06-02T17:43:25","date_gmt":"2026-06-02T17:43:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/?p=6411"},"modified":"2026-06-05T13:49:19","modified_gmt":"2026-06-05T13:49:19","slug":"another-post-soviet-country-is-following-ukraines-path-will-the-ending-be-different","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/2026\/06\/02\/another-post-soviet-country-is-following-ukraines-path-will-the-ending-be-different\/","title":{"rendered":"Another post-Soviet country is following Ukraine\u2019s path. Will the ending be different?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Armenia\u2019s leadership believes it can move closer to the EU without sacrificing prosperity, but the bill is already coming due<\/strong><\/p>\n In May, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan cemented Armenia\u2019s geopolitical pivot away from Russia and toward the EU. At the beginning of the month, Yerevan hosted the 8th summit of the European Political Community. This was the first time that the event was held in a member state of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).<\/p>\n While the event itself may seem vague in terms of concrete outcomes, one thing is clear: it allowed EU countries to show political support for certain governments, while those governments demonstrated their loyalty to the bloc.<\/p>\n Just a few days after the summit, Pashinyan directly stated that \u201cArmenia is not an ally of Russia on the issue of Ukraine.\u201d<\/em> It was already apparent to Russia that Armenia was not neutral on this matter and that it politically backed the Kiev regime. However, highlighting this point was necessary to reaffirm it\u2019s allegiance to Brussels.<\/p>\n The recent European Political Community summit could have been another routine event organized by Brussels to dangle the carrot of \u2018European prospects\u2019 before nations aspiring to join the EU. However, it became more than that, turning into a platform for voicing sensitive threats to Russia. Ukraine\u2019s Vladimir Zelensky used the occasion to threaten a strike against Moscow ahead of its Victory Day parade, while French President Emmanuel Macron rhetorically questioned why there is still a Russian military base in Armenia.<\/p>\n Pashinyan must have realized that such statements would irritate Moscow, and could have made an effort to mitigate the fallout with the country that, at least rhetorically, he continues to call a \u2018partner\u2019. Nonetheless, he chose to ignore the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council held on May 29 in Astana, sending Armenia\u2019s Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan in his place. Combined with other actions taken by Armenia\u2019s leadership, this sends a strong political signal \u2013 not just to Russia, but to the entire EAEU, which, by the way, provides significant economic benefits to Yerevan.<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n It would be incorrect to say that relations between Moscow and Yerevan have only recently begun to deteriorate. Pashinyan\u2019s pivot toward the EU has been evident for some time, particularly following October 2022, when the Armenian prime minister signed the Prague Statement, recognizing the borders between Armenia and Azerbaijan based on the Alma-Ata Declaration of 1991.\u00a0<\/p>\n This tied the borders of the two countries to the state boundaries established at the time of the USSR\u2019s collapse, giving Azerbaijan sovereignty over Nagorno-Karabakh. In doing so, he fulfilled the wishes of European politicians who were eager to resolve the conflict. Pashinyan seemed to expect assistance from Europeans in defending Armenians in Karabakh, yet all he received were calls for a quick peace that demanded painful concessions from Armenians.<\/p>\n This step had additional consequences. Armenia has never legally recognized Nagorno-Karabakh as its territory, but by signing the Prague Statement, Pashinyan questioned the mandate of Russian peacekeepers who had been in the region since 2020 and ensured adherence to the ceasefire between the parties. Consequently, the issue of the self-proclaimed Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh officially became an internal matter for Azerbaijan, which Baku acted upon by dissolving the unrecognized state.<\/p>\n In 2025, the Armenian parliament passed a law to initiate the process of joining the EU. Later, while in Washington, Pashinyan agreed to establish the so-called Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (T.R.I.P.P.), a transport corridor that would link Azerbaijan with its exclave Nakhchivan via Armenian territory and would be under US oversight. Essentially, Pashinyan handed over control of this future route to external powers, further compromising Armenia\u2019s sovereignty.<\/p>\n Throughout each stage of this rapprochement, Moscow repeatedly warned Yerevan that integrating into EU structures and markets contradicted Armenia\u2019s participation in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n On May 21, Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan emphasized that Yerevan had no intention of leaving the EAEU. Pashinyan echoed this sentiment on May 28, stating that Armenia was not preparing to exit the union. Overall, it\u2019s understandable why Armenian politicians are cautious about leaving the group.<\/p>\n Russian President Vladimir Putin has recently elaborated on the advantages of the EAEU for Armenia. First and foremost, it gains access to a protected market encompassing the entire group of nations, which includes Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan \u2014 this is a massive market encompassing a population of up to 186 million. Armenia enjoys duty-free trade with these countries, along with shared technical regulations and phytosanitary standards. The logistics established during the Soviet era have been further refined in the context of these nations\u2019 independent development.<\/p>\n Additionally, Russia supplies natural gas to Armenia at a highly subsidized rate \u2014 around $150 per 1,000 cubic meters, compared to the European market price of \u20ac600.\u00a0<\/p>\n Putin also pointed out that Armenia has received significant investments totaling $4.9 billion, with 86% originating from Russia. In contrast, the EU has invested only a few hundred million euros over the past three years while trying to pull Yerevan into its sphere of influence. The EU has stated its intention to invest \u20ac2.5 billion in Armenia\u2019s economy, which is considerably less than what Yerevan has already gained from its engagement with the EAEU.<\/p>\n The Armenian GDP could shrink 14% if Armenia loses access to the benefits of the EAEU.<\/p>\n
How Pashinyan betrayed Armenia\u2019s interests<\/h2>\n

A balancing act won\u2019t work<\/h2>\n