{"id":5643,"date":"2026-05-03T22:41:34","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T22:41:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/?p=5643"},"modified":"2026-05-15T19:38:22","modified_gmt":"2026-05-15T19:38:22","slug":"us-deep-state-flouting-citizenship-law-behind-trumps-back-zakharova-full-op-ed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/youtubexyoutube.com\/index.php\/2026\/05\/03\/us-deep-state-flouting-citizenship-law-behind-trumps-back-zakharova-full-op-ed\/","title":{"rendered":"US \u2018deep state\u2019 flouting citizenship law behind Trump\u2019s back \u2013 Zakharova (FULL OP-ED)"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman accuses the State Department of pressuring diplomats\u2019 children<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n The US State Department has quietly revived Biden-era tactics of imposing American birthright citizenship on the children of Russian diplomats, in violation of international norms, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova wrote in an op-ed on Monday.<\/p>\n RT is republishing the official English version of the op-ed:<\/p>\n While President Trump is trying to bring order to the American migration mess cooked up by his predecessors, his own staff are, behind his back, engaging in intrigue and are further damaging already ailing Russia-US relations in the sphere of migration.<\/p>\n One of Trump\u2019s central campaign promises was that there would be no legalization of illegal migrants.<\/p>\n Said and done. The only difference is that thanks to the deep state, which is clearly walking in the opposite direction from its current president towards a new one, things have turned out exactly the other way around.<\/p>\n Picture the following.<\/p>\n A Russian diplomat working in the United States receives a phone call from the State Department. It would appear that a contact has been established. Contact has indeed been established, but not of a working kind:<\/p>\n \u201cMr [\u2026]?\u201d<\/em> goes a State Department employee.<\/p>\n \u201cYes,\u201d<\/em> the Russian diplomat replies.<\/p>\n \u201cDo you have a son named Ivan?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cYes.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n Sitting at his desk, with his child at school a couple of kilometers away from his office, the man felt his heart drop into a bottomless abyss.<\/p>\n \u201cThe US State Department informs you that your son is a citizen of the United States,\u201d<\/em> the voice \u2013 whether a bureaucrat or perhaps already an AI embedded within one \u2013 tells him.<\/p>\n What follows is a dialogue that the finest surrealist dystopian writers might envy:<\/p>\n \u201cMy son is a citizen of Russia and holds no other citizenship. The US State Department has repeatedly issued my son, as a member of a diplomat\u2019s family, US visas. This contradicts common sense and US law, which combined create a uniquely unambiguous interpretation,\u201d<\/em> the Russian diplomat responds, instantly recalling his [Moscow State Institute of International Relations] MGIMO studies, Lavrov, and international law in its entirety.<\/p>\n \u201cYour son has been granted US citizenship without his consent by virtue of being born on American soil. The fact that neither he nor you were ever informed of this, and that visas were issued to him as to a foreign national, is a technical error,\u201d<\/em> the voice reads from a document.<\/p>\n \u201cBut we do not need US citizenship; we never asked for it and will never accept it,\u201d<\/em> the Russian diplomat is practically yelling in the receiver.<\/p>\n \u201cBe on notice that your child is our citizen with all the ensuing consequences, and you cannot renounce this!\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n The line goes dead, and so does the logic of whatever the United States is doing domestically and abroad.<\/p>\n No, there is no need to look for fault on the part of Russian diplomats here. There is none. Our colleagues do their work, process all documents in accordance with Russian legislation and the requirements of the Vienna Conventions, and respect US laws. When children are born on US territory, they promptly file papers to Russian citizenship knowing full well that there will be no issues with US citizenship, since diplomats are not automatically subject to the right of the soil under local law \u2013 no one can be forced to become a citizen of a foreign country.<\/p>\n However, the law in the United States is reminiscent of a mad tea party with the Mad Hatter.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s go over it once again, but this time seriously.<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The deep state in the United States has created a new problem to exert pressure on Russian diplomats, disregarding the fact that this has become a stark example of the decline of the much-vaunted American democracy. Now the State Department \u2013 or those behind the facade of American diplomacy \u2013 have begun to extend US citizenship to children of Russian consular staff born under American jurisdiction until they reach adulthood, effectively by force, under the pretext of the constitutionally enshrined right of the soil and the supposedly limited nature of consular immunity.<\/p>\n It\u2019s absurd and violates every rule in the book, and delivers a blow to their own president, but who cares when yet another act of Russophobia, so carefully cultivated by the Democratic Party, is at stake?<\/p>\n The Americans began applying this discriminatory practice against Russian personnel in 2023, as if deliberately laying a mine under Trump in order to present him in the most ridiculous light before everyone, such as the Latin American workers invited to the United States, who during the pandemic quite literally carried the country out of hell on their shoulders; the voters; the international community, which watches with astonishment as their compatriots are denied US citizenship and sent home in disgrace at a time when it is forced upon Russian diplomats. It looks like a scene from the Spider Man comic in which he becomes entangled in his own web.<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n To reiterate, the supreme law of the United States was not amended during this period, nor were bilateral conventions on diplomatic and consular relations revised.<\/p>\n The exemption concerning children of foreign diplomats is spelled out in virtually all internal regulations. An entire chapter of the US Citizenship and Immigration Services policy manual and a provision in the Code of Federal Regulations are devoted to this matter. Both documents clearly state that children of foreign diplomats do not acquire US citizenship by the right of the soil, as they enjoy diplomatic immunity and are not fully subject to the jurisdiction of the host country.<\/p>\n Moreover, this legal norm was re-affirmed by the US Supreme Court back in 1898 in the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Here is a direct quotation from the court ruling:<\/p>\n \u201cThe requirement that a person be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States excludes the application of this rule to children born of diplomatic representatives of a foreign state, children born of enemy aliens during occupation, and children of members of Indian tribes owing direct allegiance to their several tribes.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n The US side has always taken pride in its system of case law, so the complete disregard of this well-known ruling provides a very clear characterization of the actions of the US foreign policy establishment.<\/p>\n It is symptomatic that the stepped up activity by the US State Department in the matter of unlawfully granting US citizenship to the children of employees of Russian diplomatic missions \u2013 citizenship they neither need nor are allowed by local authorities to refuse \u2013 is taking place precisely now, when, on the basis of agreements between the leaders of Russia and the United States, attempts are being made to remove such irritants.<\/p>\n
